February 19, 2024

Unraveling Breast Cancer: The Role of NGS in Diagnosis and Treatment

Explore the crucial role of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in advancing breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. This comprehensive guide delves into how NGS facilitates personalized treatment strategies, compares to traditional methods, and addresses the challenges and future potential of using NGS in the fight against breast cancer.

Introduction to Breast Cancer and NGS

Breast cancer, a complex and multifaceted disease, remains one of the most significant health challenges worldwide. The integration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) into breast cancer research and treatment has opened new horizons in understanding this disease. NGS offers a comprehensive look at the genetic landscape of breast cancer, unveiling specific mutations and genetic variations that drive the disease. This deeper genetic insight is crucial for developing more effective, personalized treatment strategies, marking a significant shift from traditional, one-size-fits-all approaches. As we explore the intersection of breast cancer and NGS, we step into a realm where precision medicine becomes a reality, offering hope for better outcomes and a new understanding of breast cancer.

The Science Behind NGS in Breast Cancer Research

The science behind the use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in breast cancer research is groundbreaking. NGS technology dissects the complex genetic makeup of breast cancer at an unprecedented level, identifying key genetic mutations and variations that contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. This deep genetic sequencing enables researchers to understand the heterogeneity and unique characteristics of individual breast cancers, which is essential for the development of targeted therapies. With NGS, it's possible to pinpoint specific gene expressions and alterations, providing a roadmap for personalized treatment. The molecular insights gained through NGS not only aid in understanding the pathogenesis of breast cancer but also play a vital role in identifying potential biomarkers for early detection and predicting patient response to various treatments. Thus, NGS stands as a pillar of modern breast cancer research, driving forward the potential for more effective and individualized therapeutic strategies.

Identifying Genetic Markers in Breast Cancer

Identifying genetic markers in breast cancer is a crucial aspect where Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has made significant strides. Through NGS, researchers can pinpoint specific genetic markers, such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are known to significantly increase breast cancer risk. Beyond these, NGS helps uncover a wider spectrum of genetic mutations, some of which may be less common but equally important in understanding the disease's progression and response to treatment. This includes HER2-positive cancers and triple-negative breast cancers, each requiring different therapeutic approaches. The ability of NGS to identify these markers accurately and efficiently not only aids in early detection and risk assessment but also opens the door to more effective, targeted treatment options. As a result, NGS has become an indispensable tool in the fight against breast cancer, offering a new level of precision in the battle to understand and conquer this disease.

NGS vs. Traditional Diagnostic Methods

The comparison between Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and traditional diagnostic methods in breast cancer highlights a significant evolution in medical science. Traditional methods, such as mammography and biopsy-based histopathology, have been the cornerstone of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. While effective, these methods often provide limited information about the genetic basis of the tumor. NGS, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive analysis by sequencing the entire genome or specific regions, uncovering a vast array of genetic mutations. This depth of information facilitates a better understanding of the tumor's nature and potential response to treatments. Unlike traditional methods, NGS can detect subtle genetic changes, providing insights that are crucial for precision medicine. The shift towards NGS represents a move from generalized diagnostic methods to more personalized, genetic-based approaches, significantly enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of breast cancer treatment.

Personalized Treatment Strategies with NGS

The advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized personalized treatment strategies in breast cancer care. NGS allows for the analysis of a patient's tumor at a genetic level, providing detailed insights into specific mutations and biomarkers. This level of detail enables oncologists to develop highly personalized treatment plans, tailored to the genetic profile of each tumor. For instance, NGS can determine the presence of hormone receptors or HER2 proteins, influencing the choice of hormone therapies or HER2-targeted treatments. Additionally, it aids in identifying patients who might benefit from specific chemotherapy drugs or immunotherapies, minimizing the trial-and-error approach often associated with cancer treatment. By harnessing the power of NGS, personalized treatment for breast cancer is becoming more effective, with the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by targeting the unique aspects of each individual's cancer.

Case Studies: NGS in Action

Case studies in breast cancer research vividly illustrate the impact of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in action. One notable case involved a patient with advanced breast cancer, where NGS identified a rare genetic mutation not detectable by traditional methods. This discovery led to a targeted therapy that significantly improved the patient's prognosis. Another case study highlights how NGS facilitated the identification of specific markers in a patient's tumor, enabling the use of a novel immunotherapy approach, previously unconsidered due to lack of detailed genetic information. These real-world examples underscore the potential of NGS to transform breast cancer treatment, offering new hope and options where traditional diagnostics fall short. Such cases not only demonstrate the efficacy of NGS in identifying unique genetic profiles but also showcase its ability to directly influence and improve treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

The Future of NGS in Targeted Therapy

The future of targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment is closely intertwined with the advancements in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). As NGS technology continues to evolve, it is set to further revolutionize targeted therapy by enabling even more precise identification of genetic mutations and molecular targets. This progression will facilitate the development of new, more effective targeted drugs and treatment regimens that are specifically designed based on individual genetic profiles. The potential for NGS to contribute to real-time monitoring of treatment responses and resistance patterns holds promise for adapting therapies as tumors evolve. Looking ahead, NGS is poised to play a central role in the era of precision oncology, where treatments are not only targeted but also dynamic and adaptable, maximizing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing unnecessary side effects. The future of NGS in targeted therapy represents a paradigm shift towards truly personalized medicine, offering new hope for patients battling breast cancer.

Overcoming Challenges in NGS Implementation

Implementing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in breast cancer research and treatment comes with its set of challenges, yet significant strides have been made in overcoming these obstacles. One of the primary challenges is the complexity and volume of data generated by NGS, necessitating advanced bioinformatics tools and expertise for accurate interpretation. Another challenge lies in integrating NGS into current clinical workflows, which requires substantial adjustments in laboratory infrastructure and training for healthcare professionals. Cost is also a consideration, as NGS can be expensive, but ongoing advancements are gradually reducing these costs, making it more accessible. Furthermore, addressing ethical and privacy concerns related to genetic data is crucial in NGS implementation. Efforts to standardize NGS practices and guidelines are underway, ensuring quality and reliability in results. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of NGS in personalized breast cancer treatment continue to drive innovation and adoption, paving the way for more efficient, accurate, and individualized healthcare solutions.

Ethical and Privacy Considerations

Ethical and privacy considerations are paramount in the realm of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), especially in breast cancer research and treatment. The ability of NGS to reveal extensive genetic information raises important questions about data confidentiality, informed consent, and the potential psychological impact of genetic knowledge. Ensuring patient privacy and secure handling of genetic data is crucial, necessitating robust data protection measures and clear communication about how this information is used and shared. Ethical considerations also extend to the interpretation of results and subsequent decision-making, emphasizing the need for genetic counseling to support patients in understanding their risk profiles and treatment options. Balancing the benefits of NGS with these ethical and privacy concerns is essential, as it not only respects patient rights but also fosters trust in the use of this powerful technology. The development of comprehensive ethical guidelines and policies is critical to navigate these challenges, ensuring that NGS is used responsibly and beneficially in breast cancer care.

Conclusion: Advancing the Battle Against Breast Cancer with NGS

In conclusion, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) stands as a pivotal force in advancing the battle against breast cancer. Through its unparalleled ability to analyze the genome with precision, NGS has enabled more accurate diagnoses, informed targeted therapies, and opened new pathways for personalized treatment approaches. It has transformed our understanding of breast cancer's genetic complexity, leading to more effective and patient-specific healthcare solutions. The continuous evolution of NGS technology promises to further enhance our capabilities in combating this disease, driving forward the potential for early detection, better prognosis, and ultimately, improved survival rates for patients. As we continue to harness the power of NGS, it becomes increasingly clear that this technology is not just a tool for today's oncologists but a beacon of hope for a future where breast cancer can be managed more effectively and with greater compassion.

Getting Started with NGS Testing

Embarking on the journey of NGS Testing with Oncogena means stepping into the future of cancer diagnostics and genetic analysis. We offer advanced NGS solutions tailored to meet your specific needs, whether you're a healthcare professional, researcher, or seeking personal genetic insights.

Schedule a Call with Us to Explore How We Can Help: Our team of experts is ready to guide you through the process and answer any questions you might have. Discover how our cutting-edge NGS technology can benefit you or your patients by scheduling a call with us. We are committed to providing personalized support every step of the way.

Contact Information:

  • Email: info@oncogena.com
  • Phone: +90 (533) 779 82 62
  • Address: Acıbadem, Elysium Elit, Şeyh Galip Sk. 2/2 A Blok, 34718 Kadıköy/İstanbul
  • For more information, visit: oncogena.com/contact

Learn More About Our NGS Test: To gain a deeper understanding of what our NGS Test entails and how it can be pivotal in cancer diagnostics and beyond, please visit oncogena.com/oncogena-comprehensive-assay-plus. Here, you'll find detailed information about the test, its applications, and the benefits it offers.

At Oncogena, we believe in empowering our clients with the most advanced genetic analysis tools. Our NGS testing is more than just a service; it's a pathway to unlocking vital genetic insights that can transform healthcare outcomes. By choosing Oncogena, you're not only accessing state-of-the-art technology but also joining a community dedicated to advancing medical science and improving lives.

Start your journey with us today, and take a step towards the future of personalized medicine and genetic understanding.

Authorship and Disclaimer

This blog content has been meticulously prepared by our team of oncologists at Oncogena, leveraging their expertise and experience in the field of genetics and cancer treatment. Our aim is to provide informative and up-to-date insights on Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and its applications.

Disclaimer: While this content is written by healthcare professionals, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as medical advice. Oncogena does not assume any liability for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. We strongly recommend consulting with qualified healthcare professionals for specific medical advice, diagnoses, and treatment decisions.

Further Reading and References: For those interested in exploring more about NGS Testing and its applications, a wealth of resources and scientific literature is available. We encourage you to delve into these references for a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. These can be found in academic journals, medical publications, and on our website's resource section.

References

  1. Chakravarty D, Johnson A, Sklar J et al. Somatic genomic testing in patients with metastatic or advanced cancer: ASCO provisional clinical opinion. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022; 40; 1231–1258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harbeck N, Penault‐Llorca F, Cortes J et al. Breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019; 5; 66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shyr D, Liu G. Next generation sequencing in cancer research and clinical application. Biol. Proced. Online 2013; 15; 4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Slatko BE, Gardner AF, Ausubel FM. Overview of next‐generation sequencing technologies. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2018; 122; e59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu T, Chitnis N, Monos D, Dinh A. Next‐generation sequencing technologies: an overview. Hum. Immunol. 2021; 82; 801–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malapelle U, Pepe F, Pisapia P et al. TargetPlex FFPE‐direct DNA library preparation kit for SiRe NGS panel: an international performance evaluation study. J. Clin. Pathol. 2022; 75; 416–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eeckhoutte A, Houy A, Manié E et al. ShallowHRD: detection of homologous recombination deficiency from shallow whole genome sequencing. Bioinformatics 2020; 36; 3888–3889. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mateo J, Chakravarty D, Dienstmann R et al. A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets (ESCAT). Ann. Oncol. 2018; 29; 1895–1902. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Taylor AM et al. PARP (poly ADP‐ribose polymerase) inhibitors for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021; 2021; CD011395. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diéras V, Han HS, Kaufman B et al. Veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in BRCA‐mutated advanced breast cancer (BROCADE3): a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21; 1269–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for patients with BRCA1‐ or BRCA2‐mutated breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021; 384; 2394–2405. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2021; 32; 1475–1495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cancer Genome Atlas Network . Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012; 490; 61–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cardoso F, Paluch‐Shimon S, Senkus E et al. 5th ESO‐ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann. Oncol. 2020; 31; 1623–1649. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. André F, Ciruelos EM, Juric D et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA‐mutated, hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2‐negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR‐1. Ann. Oncol. 2021; 32; 208–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Callens C, Bidard FC, Curto‐Taribo A et al. Real‐time detection of ESR1 mutation in blood by droplet digital PCR in the PADA‐1 trial: feasibility and cross‐validation with NGS. Anal. Chem. 2022; 94; 6297–6303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Berger F, Marce M, Delaloge S et al. Randomised, open‐label, multicentric phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy, guided by ESR1 mutation monitoring in oestrogen receptor‐positive, HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer patients: study design of PADA‐1. BMJ Open 2022; 12; e055821. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marcio C, Scaltriti M, Ladany M et al. ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect NTRK fusions in daily practice and clinical research. Ann. Oncol. 2019; 30; 1417–1427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fusco N, Lopez G, Corti C et al. Mismatch repair protein loss as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancers regardless of microsatellite instability. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018; 2; pky056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee MS, Sanoff HK. Cancer of unknown primary. BMJ 2020; 371; m4050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pavlidis N, Briasouli E, Hainsworth J et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. Eur. J. Cancer 2003; 39; 1990–2005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding Q, Huo L, Peng Y, Yoon EC, Li Z, Sahin AA. Immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing metastatic breast carcinoma from other common malignancies: Update and revisit. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2022; 39; 313–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park SY, Kim BH, Kim JH, Lee S, Kang GH. Panels of immunohistochemical markers help determine primary sites of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2007; 131; 1561–1567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Andersson GG, Weiss LM. Determining tissue of origin for metastatic cancers: meta‐analysis and literature review of immunohistochemistry performance. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2010; 18; 3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hainsworth JD, Rubin MS, Spigel DR et al. Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site‐specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah Cannon research institute. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013; 31; 217–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Greco FA, Lennington WJ, Spigel DR, Hainsworth JD. Molecular profiling diagnosis in unknown primary cancer: accuracy and ability to complement standard pathology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013; 105; 782–790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vibert J, Pierron G, Benoist C et al. Identification of tissue of origin and guided therapeutic applications in cancers of unknown primary using deep learning and RNA sequencing (TransCUPtomics). J. Mol. Diagn. 2021; 23; 1380–1392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Piscuoglio S, Ng CKY, Geyer FC et al. Genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017; 3; 48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tan PH, Ellis I, Allison K et al. The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology 2020; 77; 181–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rakha EA, Aleskandarany MA, Lee AH, Ellis IO. An approach to the diagnosis of spindle cell lesions of the breast. Histopathology 2016; 68; 33–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK et al. Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat. Genet. 2015; 47; 1341–1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsang JY, Shao Y, Poon IK et al. Analysis of recurrent molecular alterations in phyllodes tumour of breast: insights into prognosis and pathogenesis. Pathology. 2022; 9; S0031‐3025(22)00163‐5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reis‐Filho JS, Pinheiro C, Lambros MBK et al. EGFR amplification and lack of activating mutations in metaplastic breast carcinomas. J. Pathol. 2006; 209; 445–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rakha EA, Brogi E, Castellano I, Quinn C. Spindle cell lesions of the breast: a diagnostic approach. Virchows Arch. 2022; 480; 127–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilbert JA, Goetz MP, Reynolds CA et al. Molecular analysis of metaplastic breast carcinoma: high EGFR copy number via aneusomy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008; 7; 944–951. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Piscuoglio S, Ng CK, Murray M et al. Massively parallel sequencing of phyllodes tumours of the breast reveals actionable mutations, and TERT promoter hotspot mutations and TERT gene amplification as likely drivers of progression. J. Pathol. 2016; 238; 508–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cani AK, Hovelson DH, McDaniel AS et al. Next‐gen sequencing exposes frequent MED12 mutations and actionable therapeutic targets in phyllodes tumors. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015; 13; 613–619. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. da Silva EM, Selenica P, Vahdatinia M et al. TERT promoter hotspot mutations and gene amplification in metaplastic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7; 43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McCart Reed AE, Kalaw EM, Lakhani SR. An update on the molecular pathology of metaplastic breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2021; 13; 161–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yoshida M, Ogawa R, Yoshida H et al. TERT promoter mutations are frequent and show association with MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumors of the breast. Br. J. Cancer 2015; 113; 1244–1248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lim SZ, Ng CCY, Rajasegaran V et al. Genomic profile of breast sarcomas: a comparison with malignant phyllodes tumours. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019; 174; 365–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Geyer FC, Li A, Papanastasiou AD, Smith A et al. Recurrent hotspot mutations in HRAS Q61 and PI3K‐AKT pathway genes as drivers of breast adenomyoepitheliomas. Nat. Commun 2018; 9; 1816. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ng CKY, Piscuoglio S, Geyer FC et al. The landscape of somatic genetic alterations in metaplastic breast carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017; 23; 3859–3870. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Piscuoglio S, Murray M, Fusco N et al. MED12 somatic mutations in fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours of the breast. Histopathology 2015; 67; 719–729. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tan BY, Md Nasir ND, Chang HY et al. Morphologic and genetic heterogeneity in breast fibroepithelial lesions—a comprehensive mapping study. Mod. Pathol. 2020; 33; 1732–1745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Callens C, Driouch K, Boulai A et al. Molecular features of untreated breast cancer and initial metastatic event inform clinical decision‐making and predict outcome: long‐term results of ESOPE, single‐arm prospective multicenter study. Genome Med. 2021; 13; 44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G et al. The genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell 2018; 34; 427–438.e6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Le Tourneau C, Kamal M, Tsimberidou AM et al. Treatment algorithms based on tumor molecular profiling: The essence of precision medicine trials. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015; 108; djv362. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Histopathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons

More news, more insights

see all

Schedule a Call with Us to Explore How We Can Help

Discover the future of cancer diagnostics with our advanced NGS solutions. Contact us now to explore how we can tailor our technology to meet your specific needs.